Webinar
4.15.2026

Re-engineering the risk-based approach: Agentic AI as the engine of continuous risk assessment & control calibration



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCQyQN-wfUg



The Risk-Based Approach (RBA) is mandated, but rarely dynamic.
The industry has implemented RBA as a governance framework — not as an operational capability. The threat environment has fundamentally changed, and financial crime risk is now continuous, global, and evolving at speed. Criminal innovation now moves faster than compliance control cycles. The challenge is no longer access to data, rather it’s interpreting risk intelligence fast enough to keep controls aligned.
Regulators are no longer asking whether you have an RBA framework. They're asking whether you can continuously demonstrate risk alignment.
Enter Agentic AI. This powerful technology can continuously monitor a myriad of sources of rich risk intelligence enabling automated risk alignment, control calibration, typology identification and classification, customer risk profiling, operations prioritization, and more.

Speaker

Elizabeth Callan - AML, FinCrime, Sanctions SME, SymphonyAI

This session covers how agentic AI can:

  • Automate risk intelligence monitoring
  • Accelerate and enhance the risk assessment process
  • Dynamically align risk intelligence and assessment to control calibration

This is continuous threat monitoring. This is the reengineered risk-based approach. This is SymphonyAI’s “Always-on Compliance.”

Access the webinar on demand.

Related resources

Re-engineering the Risk Based Approach with Agentic AI - Elizabeth Callan's complete whitepaper on the topic

Whitepaper: The New Financial Crime Ecosystem
Going beyond continuous compliance with Always-on Compliance
Modernizing Compliance without Disrupting the Business: The Always-on Compliance approach
FinCrime Frontier Report - 2025/26
Symphony Risk Intelligence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCMKlFKdruA

Discover Symphony Risk Intelligence

The AI-native FinCrime platform designed to help financial institutions move from reactive to proactive risk management.

Re-Engineering the Risk-Based Approach webinar FAQs
What is continuous risk alignment and how does it differ from the traditional risk-based approach?

Continuous risk alignment is an AI-powered evolution of the traditional risk-based approach (RBA), where risk assessments and controls update dynamically in response to emerging threats rather than on a periodic or point-in-time basis. Unlike the traditional RBA, which relies on manual, cyclical reviews, continuous risk alignment uses agentic AI to monitor threat intelligence and recalibrate controls in near real time.

How can agentic AI improve financial crime compliance programs?

Agentic AI can autonomously monitor regulatory publications, law enforcement alerts, FATF typologies, and enforcement actions to extract actionable threat intelligence at scale and speed. This enables financial institutions to continuously update customer risk ratings, tune transaction monitoring scenarios, and align controls with real-world financial crime threats.

What are the key regulatory drivers behind modernising the risk-based approach in AML and CFT?

Regulators including FATF, the Wolfsburg Group, and FinCEN have increasingly emphasized that AML/CFT programs must be effective and outcomes-focused, not just efficient. In the US, the recent notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) specifically requires prompt updates to risk assessments when an institution's risk profile changes, making continuous monitoring a practical necessity.

Does agentic AI replace existing risk assessment platforms and tools?

Agentic AI is designed to integrate with and enhance existing risk assessment platforms, not replace them. It functions as an intelligence layer that continuously surfaces risk insights, recommends control calibrations, and informs risk scoring within the systems financial institutions already use.

How does the system handle source credibility when synthesizing threat intelligence?

The technology applies configurable weighting to different intelligence sources, recognising that a FinCEN advisory carries different significance than an open-source media report or academic publication. Financial institutions can adjust these confidence weightings to reflect their regulatory jurisdiction and internal risk appetite.

Access Now