
In 2024, AFASA was introduced in response to the escalating prevalence of financial account scams in the Philippines. An incredible 42.3% of those within the country have been subject to scams. The rapid adoption of digital technologies, particularly in the financial services sector, has enabled cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities and target individuals and institutions alike. This trend has led to significant financial losses, eroding public trust in digital financial systems, and creating a need for robust legal frameworks to combat these criminal activities.
In 2022, Bangko Central ng Pilipinas (BSP) Circular 1140 [1] linked requirements for information technology risk management and fraud monitoring. This was a set of aggressive security measures to maintain consumer trust in digital financial channels. It includes the adoption of real-time monitoring, analysis of customer behavior, and the ability to block transactions.
In 2024, the AFASA and its associated implementing rules and regulations (IRRs) extended these requirements to safeguard the public from cybercriminals and syndicates exploiting financial accounts. AFASA also criminalized money muling , social engineering schemes, and economic sabotage. BSP also received additional powers to investigate scams and share information with law enforcement.
Under AFASA, financial services (bank and non-bank) businesses must have adequate risk management systems in place. This includes real-time detection for velocity transactions, geolocation monitoring, behavioral anomaly detection, and blacklist screening . Multi-factor authentication must also evolve from one-time-passwords (OTPs). Such improvements include biometrics, behavioral biometrics , adaptive authentication, and password-less methods. For customers, they must be able to have control of their digital finances through access to a kill switch, managing transaction limits, and receiving notifications about account activities.
While some of these features have become the standard in other parts of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) , not all countries have adopted the granular approach of the Philippines in mandating specific fraud monitoring capability as part of formal regulatory frameworks. The Philippines has also specified the time period to hold funds (30 days) and provided a liability framework for safe harbor and restitution. The country has also designated a central unit at BSP that can share information locally and seek cross-border enforcement for the proceeds of scams.
In addition to record consumer losses and diminished trust in the digital economy, criminals have also overcome traditional fraud controls, like OTPs.
With scams growing at exponential rates [2][3], any fraud control that seeks the customer’s agreement to a transaction renders these types of authentication near useless. This is because in the context of scams, customers generally do not recognize they will lose money at the time of the transaction.
Couple that with criminals' ability to port numbers, swap SIMS , or engage in phishing attacks to intercept OTPs. It is clear that these SMS-generated authentication methods have become an outdated control.
Financial services businesses now need to use the digital channels data available to them about unusual access or changes in customer behavior. This equips financial services teams to better protect customers and reduce the impacts of fraud.
By June 2026, all BSP-supervised financial institutions must phase out SMS and email OTPs for high-risk transactions. This is part of BSP Circular 1213[4], 1214[5] , and 1215 [6]. In their place, banks must implement more secure and phishing-resistant authentication methods.
These include:
They will also need to extend real-time monitoring to go beyond the basic rules to detect fraud, and be able to:
The BSP's request is not a suggestion but a regulatory requirement. It acts as a clear signal that the era of outdated security is over. Sooner rather than later, other jurisdictions will follow suit in enhancing their security guidelines.
Moving away from SMS OTP is a technical shift, but it’s also a strategic one. And getting to a next-generation real-time monitoring that extends beyond transactions and analyzes other digital footprints allows fraud prevention teams to evolve from being reactive to providing proactive intelligence.
To stay effective, they must design flexible, risk-based authentication journeys and break down silos by fostering greater collaboration between fraud, identity, and digital experience teams. If done correctly, fraud prevention can be an organization’s first and strongest line of defense.
While some institutions in the Philippines may view BSP Circular 1213, 1214, and 1215 as more regulatory hurdles, they also offer opportunity. Banks can rebuild customer trust through seamless, secure experiences, reduce fraud losses from account takeovers and social engineering, and get ahead of global regulatory trends. Now is the time to redesign processes for a safer and more user-friendly future.
Who still uses candles for everyday lighting when there are more efficient, safer methods of lighting available? As such, it's time to move on from outdated technology like SMS OTPs. Yes, they might still work currently, but it will put your customers and your reputation at risk.
The Philippines is drawing a line in the sand. Now it’s up to fraud leaders globally to do the same.
We’d love to show you what smarter, adaptive fraud prevention looks like – and how bringing these risk signals into your central view of customers will support more efficient and risk-oriented workflows to protect customers and prevent financial crime
Get in touch to learn more about NetReveal Payment Fraud and our full financial crime prevention suite of products, including AI agents , AI overlays, and the award-winning Sensa Investigation Hub case management system.
Citations
[1] https://www.bsp.gov.ph/Regulations/Issuances/2022/1140.pdf
[2] https://www.gasa.org/post/2024-asia-scam-report-688-billion-lost
[3] https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/documents/Publications/2025/Inflection_Point_2025.pdf
[4] https://www.bsp.gov.ph/Regulations/Published%20Issuances/Images/Circular_1213.pdf
[5] https://www.bsp.gov.ph/Regulations/Issuances/2025/1214.pdf
[6] https://www.bsp.gov.ph/Regulations/Issuances/2025/1215.pdf
How Malaysia is combating fraud and scam prevention
Protecting customers from fraud with advanced behavioral intelligence
Stopping fraud before it happens: Behavioral intelligence in action
Fraudsters are logging in. Is your fraud strategy logged off?
Using biometrics in financial crime prevention? Regulators think you should be
Why financial institutions can’t afford to ignore biometrics anymore
Watch the recent webinar on fraud and behavioral intelligence